Book Reports/ Inheritance Tax book report 42260

Book Reports term papers
Disclaimer: Free essays on Book Reports posted on this site were donated by anonymous users and are provided for informational use only. The free Book Reports research paper (Inheritance Tax essay) presented on this page should not be viewed as a sample of our on-line writing service. If you need fresh and competent research / writing on Book Reports, use the professional writing service offered by our company.
View / hide essay

Inheritance tax is a tax which occurs on the death of an individual. It is the tax paid on a person�s estate. Generally, this is everything that a person owns at the time of his/her death, with a reduction of what such person owes. At times, it is also payable on assets, which include things like possessions, money, property, and investments, that may have given away during the lifetime. Assets include. There is a difference between an inheritance tax and an estate tax in the international law. The estate tax taxes the personal commissioners of the deceased, while the inheritance tax taxes the recipients of the estate. In some jurisdictions in the United States, the term estate tax is used.

�The estate tax in the United States is a tax imposed on the transfer of the taxable estate of a deceased person, whether such property is transferred via a will or according to the state laws of intestacy� (Estate Tax, ¶1). It is an excise tax imposed on the transmission or receipt or simply conveying of property at death. Inheritance tax, also called as legacy tax, is typically determined by the assessment of the assets obtained by each recipient and by receiver�s relationship to the decedent. It normally includes, in the United States, all property which the decedent possessed incidents of ownership of, owned, or exercised control of, at death. Most estates are excepted from this tax for the reason that the worth of their belongings is less than the tax threshold. States, which impose estate tax, called it either estate tax or an inheritance tax. However, in the 1990s, the phrase death tax has been extensively used by those who want to get rid of the estate tax, since the terminology used in communicating a political matter can influence popular opinion. This tax is imposed on all conveys of property, except if left to a charitable organization or to a spouse, made as an occurrence of the death of the owner, like a conveyance of property from an intestate estate or trust, or the imbursement of definite financial account or life insurance benefits sums to beneficiaries.

Inheritance Tax has been around in one appearance or another ever since the reign of Augustus in the Roman Empire. The original intention was to increase funds for the soldiers' pensions, because Augustus reigned during the time of relative harmony and considered necessary to pension off some of the soldiers. The inheritance tax during his time applied only to those with a property value over 100,000 sesterti and did not apply to close relative.

The inheritance tax in the United States started in 1979, when the Congress imposed a legacy tax for the purpose of starting the building of a Navy for the America. This tax was imposed on all descents, testamentary characters, and successions to the estate of intestate except those to wives, husbands, parents, or lineal descendants. In 1862, a tax was enacted on assets transfers, which was in the structure of an inheritance tax, for the purpose of paying the revenue for the Civil War. This is a tax chargeable distributive share, and a probate responsibility was chargeable against the whole estate. This was repealed by the Congress, later on, because the Civil War had ended. In 1898, an inheritance tax was passed, which was also for the purpose of raising revenue for military spending, and which determined the tax based on the range of the decedent�s estate as well as the correlation between the decedent and the beneficiary. This law was again repealed. In 1916 a federal estate tax was ratified to unwarranted attentions of inherited wealth and to settle the cost of military attentiveness for World War I. An estate tax instead of an inheritance tax was suggested because several states already inflicted inheritances taxes, and it would aid shape a well-balanced system of inheritance taxation between the various states and the federal government, aside from the fact that it could also be more competently managed with less divergence than a tax founded on upon inherited shares. Reacting to tax payer management, the Congress passed a credit against the federal estate tax intended for state death taxes paid to attain a consistent estate tax scheme. Alterations to the federal estate tax took place in 2001 as a component of President Bush�s Economic Growth and Taxpayer Relief Act of 2001 (EGTRRA). In the past, an inheritance or estate tax was enacted at a time the government desired revenue. Near the late 1800�s, a call for an estate tax to reallocate wealth began. �The estate tax movement was propelled into the political limelight by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1906� (Silberstain, Debra Ramin, p. 6). Roosevelt, then, projected a radical death duty to get better the allocation of the tax burden, create revenue, and conserve fairness of opportunity. In the year 1912, the Progressive Party sought a marked off inheritance tax to make equal property holdings; and no estate tax was passed until 1916. The main purpose of the 1916 tax was to produce revenue for World War I. A movement against estate taxation, initiated by Treasury Secretary Mellon, began in the 1920�s. President Franklin Roosevelt was worried about the consequences of contemplated wealth and inherited economic influence, thus, in 1935, he suggested momentous and progressive estate taxes to normalize the wealth of the few for the advantage of many. The obliteration and rearrangement of great wealth was mostly representational during the Roosevelt years.

There are people who agree and disagree the inheritance or estate tax. Those who favor the estate tax argue that it prevents the maintenance of wealth, without tax, in well-to-do families and that it is indispensable to a structure of progressive taxation. Concerning the farmers, it was countered that there is an exclusion built into the law that is particularly intended for family-owned farms. It was indicated that it concerns only estates of substantial size and offers many credits that permit an important piece of even huge estates to flee from taxation. Furthermore, wealth is not being taxed but only the conveyance of that wealth and that a lot of large fortunes correspond to unrealized capital gains which will not at all be taxed as capital gains in the federal income tax. Some object that it functions as a double or triple taxation, however, a lot of the incomes that are subject to the inheritance tax were by no means taxed for they were unrealized gains so it should be seen as a solitary tax on the inheritors of big estates, and double and triple taxation is ordinary. Inheritance tax is a better resource of revenue. Abolishing the inheritance tax will effect in tens of billions of dollars vanished per annum from the federal funds. It was said that inheritance tax is remedial against the expansion of a race of inactive rich. It was suggested that the further wealth inherited by mature people, the more probable they are to leave suddenly the labor market. It is less of a disincentive, because it does not tax the money that the earner uses, but simply that which he or she desires to give away for non-charitable reasons. Moreover, consenting the rich to bestow unlimited wealth on succeeding generations will result to disincentivize hard work in those future generations. In ancient times, funeral involved major wealth expenditure, and the well-to-do were factually buried or burned alongside with nearly all of their wealth. The purpose was to put off accretion of great differences of wealth, which had a propensity to undermine societies and lead to societal inequity, ultimate revolution, or disturbance of carrying out economic systems. This economic protection control device is now partly imposed through the inheritance tax that strips overindulgence wealth from the dead and redirects it back to the people as a whole. It adds to progressivity in the income tax system, and it is considered the most progressive of all of the federal taxes. �inherited wealth is seen as windfall to the recipient, such a tax source may be seen by some as fairer than ta earnings that are the result of work and effort� (Inheritance Tax: Pros and Cons). Heirs receive a stepped-up basis of assets; therefore, there are escapes of unrealized capital gains from the taxation. �Families that accrue large gains through the appreciation of their wealth in assets can, in the absence of an estate tax, largely escape any taxes on these gains by passing on the assets to their heirs� (Inheritance Tax: Pros and Cons, ¶5). Attempts at heaving this money through alternative way would be felt mainly by the poor. It is a subject of timing and national precedence, and not justice to rich people. It is entirely a matter of equality to the nation as a whole, to the middle class taxpayers and to the disadvantaged in the country.

Those against the inheritance tax argue that the tax duty in itself can suppose a disproportionate position in planning; perhaps overwhelming more primary decisions with regard the underlying assets. In some cases, it is maintained to generate an unwarranted burden. �For example, pending estate taxes could become an artificial disincentive to further investment in an otherwise viable business � increasing the appeal of tax- or investment-reducing alternatives such as liquidation, downsizing, divestiture, or retirement� (Estate Tax, ¶28). Elder individuals owning, when pondering ongoing venture perils and marginal rates of return in light of tax features, might see less worth in preserving these taxable enterprises. They may well, as an alternative, choose to decrease risk and conserve capital, by changing resources, liquidating assets, and using tax avoidance methods. Another argument is a moral one. The inheritor of wealth ought not to have the burden of tax for the reason that he or she did not earn it straight. True, the receiver may not have a direct moral claim neither does anyone else. The privileges to the wealth are with the deceased person, for she or he earned it initially paid taxes on it repeatedly while living. The rights are within the deceased to dispose the wealth as he or she sees fit. Logically, anyone maintaining that an heir does not be worthy of inherited wealth could surely not assert a right to utilize the power of government to take away that wealth on behalf of unknown others who most positively would not ought to have the wealth by that same line of philosophy. It is argue that excess wealth must be stripped from the deceased without submitting a meaning of what excess wealth could perhaps mean and why it would be disagreeable if obtained through the truthful endeavor of a productive life. It was found on research that the inheritance tax acts is a tough disincentive toward entrepreneurship. It has also been found to inflict a big compliance burden on the U.S. economy. Some studies have estimated the fulfillment costs of the federal inheritance tax to be approximately equal to the total of revenue raised, almost five times more expensive per dollar of revenue compared to the federal income tax, making it one of the most incompetent revenue sources. It decreases savings and economic expansion. It also burdens family farms and businesses and makes it more complex to pass on these possessions to the next generation who can carry on the business. Tremendously wealthy people do not mount up wealth now through family farms and small businesses. Big farms are held by corporations, and small businesses have to grow into huge corporations to give individuals immense wealth. It is also argue that death is not a suitable circumstance to oblige a tax. Wealth has already been taxed via income taxes, although this is not the case for unrealized capital gains. Double taxation takes place, because a person is taxed yearly for his or her incomes, and then, he is taxed again on some possessions he acquires with income leftover after taxes. Most possessions conveyed with estates are not taxed until sold. It is also declared that the complication of the tax not only requires compliance and administration burdens but weakens the progressivity of the tax. It might also affect the charitable contributions and the state and local estate taxes. It is a form of double taxation, for people have already donated income and capital gains taxes. The society desires a way to reassign wealth from one generation to another generation, particularly as the young now struggle to get a foot on the assets ladder.

�In June 2006, a clear majority of the US Senate voted a bill for permanent repeal of the tax on inherited wealth, but the measure fell short of the 60 votes required to secure passage� (Bertocchi, ¶4). This vote followed an April 2005 resolution by the House to revoke the estate tax enduringly. These are just the most current progresses which occurred following the tax-reduction package adopted in 2001, which forced a slow phase-out by 2010, followed by absolute reinstatement in 2011. A complex and theoretically flawed death tax system currently exists. �The 2001 changes result in a full repeal in the estate tax in 2010, followed by a complicated gift tax scheme, and full reinstatement of today�s law in 2011� (Silberstein, p. 8). The small businesses and farmers were able to encourage the Congress that inheritance tax decrease is essential to conserve the family farm and businesses. Throughout the moment of an aging populace, escalating wealth dissimilarity and a necessity for bigger revenue sources, the inheritance tax is a practical source for financing significant social guiding principle proposals. �Wealth equalization and the shift of wealth composition toward harder-to-trace financial instruments both push toward further reduction of the inheritance tax, as the expression of a politico-economic choice within a democracy� (Bertocchi, ¶8). Its destiny shall eventually depend on whether or not the present propensity to an exacerbation of profits difference will ultimately overturn the waning secular trend of wealth disparity and, thus, shift voters� preferences back toward a better position for inheritance taxation. Policy focus ought to be less on the notion of breaking up wealth absorptions and more for the call for revenue to make possible the social justice.

Works Cited

Bertocchi, Graziella. The Uncertain Future Of Inheritance Taxation. July 15, 2007. Vox. July 3, 2008. Http://

Estate Tax in the United States. June 7, 2008. Wikepedia. July 3, 2008. Http://en.

Inheritance Tax: Pros and Cons. Almanac of Policy Issues. July 3, 2008. Http://www.

Silberstein, Debra Rahmin. A History of the Estate Tax � A Source of Revenue or Vehicle for Wealth Redistribution. Brandeis Graduate Journal Volume 1. July 3, 2008. Http://

White, Deborah. Pros & Mainly Cons of Repealing the Estate Tax. July 3, 2008. Http://


Live support is now available round-the-clock 24/7
A paper writing site You CAN trust!
  • 10+ years of experience in paper writing
  • Any assignment on any level. Any deadline!
  • Open 24/7 Your essay will be done on time!
  • 200+ essay writers. Live Chat. Great support
  • No Plagiarism. Satisfaction. Confidentiality.